tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22906998.post4539808691030006849..comments2024-03-29T02:18:35.303-07:00Comments on TAG Blog: Mid September B.O.Steve Huletthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05537689111433326847noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22906998.post-3913810581943933942007-09-17T17:18:00.000-07:002007-09-17T17:18:00.000-07:00I agree that it's a big waste of money to have fam...I agree that it's a big waste of money to have famous actors voice animated characters.<BR/>Some argue that it draws more audience, but that did not help Dreamworks's "Sinbad" at all.<BR/><BR/>However...what has that to do with the post?<BR/><BR/>RufusAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22906998.post-69688671715710297292007-09-16T16:29:00.000-07:002007-09-16T16:29:00.000-07:00Not to take away from Jodie Foster, but I think th...Not to take away from Jodie Foster, but I think that the use of celebrity voices in feature films on the whole are over rated. Usually a person isn't famous for their voice, unless they were doing voice work first. Take Thumper in Bambi, the little boy who played him wasn't any one special, but he had a perfect voice for the character. It had a special fit. Then take Jennifer Aniston's work in Iron Giant. Did you know it was she was even in Iron Giant? My point exactly. The studio probably paid Anniston way more than they would have paid someone less well known, for the sake of the name. Is it really worth that much, when you could achieve a more memorable effect with someone less well known? Why not look for real voice talent that really fits a character to make a lasting impression instead of the latest A-lister with out recent work?Aurorahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03875094733695356028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22906998.post-50139683765305070562007-09-16T16:26:00.000-07:002007-09-16T16:26:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Aurorahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03875094733695356028noreply@blogger.com