Thursday, December 06, 2007

At Nickelodeon

As many know, Viacom has rolled back pension, health and sick benefits for non-represented staff (by "non-represented" I mean non-union) at its various units around the country.

Earlier in the week, I had a meeting with H.R. about the changes. I know and like the Human Resource staff; rolling the changes out to affected employees was not among their happier experiences. But the decisions for the cuts were made higher up the food chain, and their job is to implement corporate policy, not argue...

The bad news for non-repped employees is that they'll be taking hits in their 401(k) plan, their health benefits, and the number of sick days they get. From what I've heard, nobody received the roll-backs with joy.

The good news for union employees (and this is mostly Local 839 people), nothing much changes. Their pension benefits are the same. The 401(k) is unaffected, and the number of sick days won't change for the duration of the current contract.

I feel badly for the corporate employees, as do Nick's H.R. folks. But companies do what companies do. Obviously keeping margins up takes priority here ...

8 comments:

Cartoons? said...

As I understand it,they did the cuts Now to avoid the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
Which take affect guess...that's right, Jan.1 2008.
Is it all clear, as to why they chose to cut their employees throats right now?


President Bush Signs H.R. 4, the Pension Protection Act of 2006
Dwight D. Eisenhower Executive Office Building
Room 450


Fact sheet Fact Sheet: The Pension Protection Act of 2006: Ensuring Greater Retirement Security for American Workers

1:13 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Please be seated. Thanks. Welcome to the White House. We're glad you're here. In a few moments, I will have the honor of signing the most sweeping reform of America's pension laws in over 30 years, the Pension Protection Act of 2006. And we welcome you here to witness the signing.

Americans who spend a lifetime working hard should be confident that their pensions will be there when they retire. Last year I asked Congress to strengthen protections for the pensions of our workers. Members of both parties came together to pass a good bill that will improve our pension system, while expanding opportunities for Americans to build their own nest-eggs for retirement. And I'm really pleased to sign this bill into law.

President George W. Bush signs into law H.R. 4, the Pension Protection Act of 2006, Thursday, Aug. 17, 2006. Joining him onstage in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building are, from left: Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao; Rep. Buck McKeon of California; Rep. John Boehner of Ohio; Senator Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark.; Senator Michael Enzi, R-Wyo., and Rep. Bill Thomas of California. Said the President, "Americans who spend a lifetime working hard should be confident that their pensions will be there when they retire." White House photo by Kimberlee HewittI want to thank two members of my -- three members of my Cabinet who have joined us today: Secretary of Treasury Hank Paulson, Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao, and the Director of the OMB Rob Portman. As an aside, while Portman served in Congress he was the principal author of some of the important provisions of this bill.

I also want to welcome members of the United States Senate and the House of Representatives here. I welcome Senator Mike Enzi, who is the Chairman of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. I welcome Senator Blanche Lincoln from Arkansas. I welcome Congressman John Boehner, House Majority Leader, who was instrumental in getting this bill passed; along with Buck McKeon, who's the Chairman of the Education and Workforce Committee; Congressman Bill Thomas, Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee; Congressman John Kline of Minnesota. Thank you all for coming. Thanks for coming back from your vacations. (Applause.)

Many Americans work for private companies that offer traditional pensions, and most of those companies are meeting their obligations to their employees and their retirees. Yet, some businesses are not putting away the cash they need to fund the pensions they promised to their workers. These companies get into financial trouble and go bankrupt, their underfunded pension plans can leave some retirees with checks much smaller than the ones they were promised.

The federal government has created an insurance system for businesses offering private pensions, and that insurance is funded by premiums collected from these employers. When some businesses fail to fund their pension plans and are unable to meet their obligations to their employees, it puts a strain on the entire system.

And if there's not enough money in the system to cover all the extra costs, American taxpayers could be called on to make up the shortfall. Every American has an interest in seeing this system fixed, whether you're a worker at a company with an underfunded pension, or a taxpayer who might get stuck with the bill.

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 will help shore up our pension insurance system in several key ways. It requires companies who underfund their pension plans to pay additional premiums. It extends the requirement that companies that terminate their pensions must provide extra funding for the system. This legislation insists that companies measure their obligations of their pension plans more accurately. It closes loopholes that allow underfunded plans to skip pension payments. It raises caps on the amount that employers can put into their pension plans so they can add more money during good times and build up a cushion that can keep pensions solvent in lean times.

Finally, this legislation prevents companies with underfunded pension plans from digging the hole deeper by promising extra benefits to their workers without paying for those promises up front. The problem of underfunded pensions will not be eliminated overnight. This bill establishes sound standards for pension funding, yet, in the end, the primary responsibility rests with employers to fund the pension promises as soon as they can.

The message from this administration, from those of us up here today, is this: You should keep the promises you make to your workers. If you offer a private pension plan to your employees, you have a duty to set aside enough money now so your workers will get what they've been promised when they retire.

In addition to reforming the laws governing traditional private pensions, the bill I signed today also contains provisions to help workers who save for retirement through defined contribution plans like IRAs and 401(k)s. These savings plans are helping Americans build a society of ownership and financial independence.

And this legislation will make it easier for workers to participate in these plans. It will remove barriers that prevent companies from automatically enrolling their employees in these savings plans, ensure that workers have more information about the performance of their accounts, provide greater access to professional advice about investing safely for retirement, and give workers greater control over how their accounts are invested.

Finally, this bill makes permanent the higher contribution limits for IRAs and 401(k)s that we passed in 2001, and that will enable more workers to build larger nest eggs for retirement.

To ensure more secure retirement for all Americans we've got more work to do. We must also prepare for the impact of the baby boomer generation's retirement, and what that impact will have on federal entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare. As more baby boomers stop contributing payroll taxes and start collecting benefits -- people like me -- it will create an enormous strain on our programs. Entitlement programs are projected to grow faster than the economy, faster than the population and faster than the rate of inflation. If we fail to act, spending on Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid will be almost 60 percent of the entire federal budget in the year 2030. And that's going to leave future generations with impossible choices: staggering tax increases, immense deficits or deep cuts in benefits.

We have an obligation to confront this problem now. The Secretary of Treasury understands what I'm telling the Congress: Now is the time to move; now is the time to do our duty. I'm going to continue to work with the Congress and call on the Congress to work with the administration to reform these programs so we can ensure a secure retirement for all Americans.

Today, we've taken an important step toward ensuring greater retirement security for millions of American workers. I want to thank the House and the Senate for their good work on this vital legislation. It's been hard work. It took a lot of pages to write that bill, as you can see. (Laughter.) But the members did good work, and now I'd ask them to join me as I sign into law the Pension Protection Act of 2006.

Anonymous said...

which just goes to show that the more we allow other people to fuck with our money (government and unions alike) the more fucked we get.

Cartoons? said...

Actually for me, it goes to show why a Union is a good idea.
The people getting screwed are the ones without Union Representation.
My pension is doing fine. Why, because it is covered by the Union.

Anonymous said...

Yes, it's interesting to note that the anti-union shill places blame everywhere except on who actually did the screwing--the corporation. No one forced the corporate board to do this--they chose to.

Steve Hulett said...

which just goes to show that the more we allow other people to fuck with our money (government and unions alike) the more fucked we get.

How do the things above show anything of the sort? As Mr. Spock would say, "illogical."

The government (the BUSH Administration) drafts new retirement protections.

The union (Local 839) protects pension benefits.

And the poster blames those entities that are protecting as the problem, with no mention of the entity that took away the benefit.

Say what?

Anonymous said...

>>As more baby boomers stop contributing payroll taxes and start collecting benefits -- people like me -- it will create an enormous strain on our programs.

Thanks, hippies. If I see Dennis Hopper shilling Ameriprise on television to Steve Winwood one more time, I'm going to f'ing explode. If only he bit the dust instead of James Dean...

Cartoons? said...

Some movement...we shall see.

http://gawker.com/news/memos/viacom-apologizes-to-permalancers-returns-401ks-to-some-331288.php

Cartoons? said...

http://gawker.com/news/memos/
viacom-apologizes-to-
permalancers-returns-
401ks-to-some-331288.php

Site Meter